Predator-prey
models are the building masses of the bio-and environments as bio
masses are become out of their asset masses. Species contend, advance and
scatter essentially to look for assets to support their battle for their very
presence. Contingent upon their particular settings of uses, they can take the
types of asset resource-consumer, plant-herbivore, parasite-have, tumor cells-
immune structure, vulnerable irresistible collaborations, and so on. They
manage the general misfortune win connections and thus may have applications
outside of biological systems. At the point when focused connections are
painstakingly inspected, they are regularly in actuality a few types of
predator-prey communication in simulation.
Looking at Lotka-Volterra Model:
The well
known Italian mathematician Vito Volterra proposed a differential condition
model to clarify the watched increment in predator fish in the Adriatic Sea
during World War I. Simultaneously in the United States, the conditions
contemplated by Volterra were determined freely by Alfred Lotka (1925) to
portray a theoretical synthetic response wherein the concoction fixations
waver. The Lotka-Volterra model is the least complex model of predator-prey
communications. It depends on direct per capita development rates, which are
composed as f=b−py and g=rx−d.
A detailed explanation of the parameters:
The parameter b
is the development rate of species x (the prey) without communication with
species y (the predators). Prey numbers are reduced by these collaborations:
The per capita development rate diminishes (here directly) with expanding
y, conceivably getting to be negative.
The parameter p
estimates the effect of predation on x˙/x.
The parameter d
is the death rate of species y without connection with species x.
The term rx
means the net rate of development of the predator population in light of
the size of the prey population.
Summary of Paulo Freire's 1968 book . See also Youtube video esp Chomsky, Freire 1998 Cultural Action for Freedom publication and Zhong Yaying ubc 2018 thesis
ONE version of misnamed "Tragedy of the Commons" in which an open-access resources is overexploited by individuals maximizing their respective short-term gains from its use. The delay in the impact of individual activities leads to overshoot of carrying capacity.
ONE version of Success to the Successful in which equally productive persons/groups/processes gain shares of a per-period allocation of resources based on their respective performance. Differences in INITIAL allocation can lead to larger and larger gaps in performance and, therefore, next-period allocation.
Use to explore how initial inequality can exacerbate inequality. Adjust the "Gains" flow to explore how inequality itself can become a drag on overall productivity (will need additional primitives).
Perceptual Control Theory Model of Balancing an Inverted Pendulum. See Kennaway's slides on Robotics. as well as PCT example WIP notes. Compare with IM-1831 from Z209 from Hartmut Bossel's System Zoo 1 p112-118
Crea un Bucle de Realimentación Negativa, modelando el llenado de un vaso con agua. Esta versión incluye el concepto de manejo de tabla o no liberalidad.
Crea un Bucle de Realimentación Negativa, modelando el llenado de un vaso con agua. Esta versión incluye el concepto de manejo de tabla o no liberalidad.
