Wealth projection after 40 years.

저량은 450000

This framework can be used to evaluate the sustainability of a country's debt profile. The dynamics generated are based on the interaction and feedback between a government agent, a rating agency and the financial market in a stock-flow consistent manner.

Das Modell sensibilisiert für die langfristigen Folgen von Inflation und Besteuerung bei Kapitalanlagen

Process to show the importance of on time invoice payment to the safety of USA

Das Modell sensibilisiert für die langfristigen Folgen von Inflation und Besteuerung bei Kapitalanlagen

FORCED GROWTH GROWTH GOES INTO TURBULENT CHAOTIC DESTRUCTION 
 BEWARE pushing increased growth blows the system!
(governments are trying to push growth on already unstable systems !)

The existing global capitalistic growth paradigm is totally flawed

The chaotic turbulence is the result of the concept and flawed strategy of infinite bigness this has been the destructive influence on all empires and now shown up by Feigenbaum numbers and Dunbar numbers for neural netwoirks

See Guy Lakeman Bubble Theory for more details on keeping systems within finite limited size working capacity containers (villages communities)

De Innovadores a Imitadores

New Product Adoption Dynamics models how an innovation spreads through a population via two main drivers:

• Innovator probability, which determines how many people adopt the product independently and autonomously.

• Imitator conversion rate, which measures how many new adopters join due to social contact and word of mouth (WOM).

This approach helps us understand how the total flow of new adopters evolves over time.

📈 Applied example: In the adoption of renewable energy, early users (innovators) install solar panels out of conviction or future-oriented vision. Later, their visible results and testimonials create an imitation effect among neighbors, accelerating broader adoption. This model helps predict how much diffusion can be achieved through different promotional strategies or public policies.

How revenue effected with changing class numbers

Simulatioin cannot find primitives which are indeed posted.

Model-SIM from chapter 3 of Wynn Godley and Marc Lavoie's Monetary Economics. Simplest model with government money that is also stock-flow consistent.

Simple model used to assess the likely outcome of Revenue and Profit due to variability of purchase price, price impact on Units Sold, and Units Sold impact on Unit Cost.

Das Modell sensibilisiert für die langfristigen Folgen von Inflation und Besteuerung bei Kapitalanlagen

Simulation of MTBF with controls


The inverse curve is the trust time
On the right the increase in failures brings its inverse which is loss of trust and move into suspicion and lack of confidence.
This can be seen in strategic social applications with those who put economy before providing the priorities of the basic living infrastructures for all.

This applies to policies and strategic decisions as well as physical equipment.
A) Equipment wears out through friction and preventive maintenance can increase the useful lifetime, 
B) Policies/working practices/guidelines have to be updated to reflect changes in the external environment and eventually be replaced when for instance a population rises too large (constitutional changes are required to keep pace with evolution, e.g. the concepts of the ancient Greeks, 3000 years ago, who based their thoughts on a small population cannot be applied in 2013 except where populations can be contained into productive working communities with balanced profit and loss centers to ensure sustainability)

Early Life
Useful Life

Wearout

We are modeling future cash flows in the system consisting of three interacting parties, one of which secures deals between the two others which do not trust each other.

Time chart of process in background of reporting

A revised theory around business development and the variables that impact the successful uplift in the sales of financial products via adviser intermediaries who deal with clients. Key role players are the brokerage in this case AIFA, advisers representing AIFA, adviser sales support, product providers.

Neoliberalism uses a deceptive narrative to declare that money the government spends into the economy in excesses of the taxes it collects creates a ‘government debt’. In fact, the money the government spends into the economy in excess of the taxes is an income, a benefit for the private sector. When the government issues bonds, the money the private sector uses to buy them via banks comes from a residual cushion of dollars that the government already spent into the economy but has not yet taxed back.  If this were not the case, if the government had taxed back all the money it spent into the economy, then the economy could not function. There would be no dollars in the economy, since the government is the sole supplier of U.S. dollars! In the doted rectangle in the graph you can see that the dollars paid to the government for bonds sits in a dollar asset account. When the government issues bonds it simply provides the public and institutions with a desirable money substitute that pays interest i.e. Treasury bonds. It is a swap of one kind of financial asset for another. To register this swap the government debits the dollar asset account and credits the bond account.  When the time comes to redeem (take back) the bonds, all the government does is revers the swap, and that’s all!  When you look at the total amount of finacial assets in the private sector,  these remain constant at $ 25 BN  after the payment of $ 5 BN taxes. This implies that  no lending of financial assets of the private sector to the government has taken place during the swap operation. The money was always there. The debt mountain is an illusion!

We are modeling future cash flows in the system consisting of three interacting parties, one of which secures deals between the two others which do not trust each other.